A Field-Based Observational Study on Antiparasitic Control Measures and Outcomes in Captive Species at Lahore Safari Park

Field-Based Observational Study on Antiparasitic Control Measures Captive Species

Abstract

There are a large number of wild animals that die, both in their natural home and in the confines of captivity, especially as a result of parasitism.  Objectives: To evaluate the use of antiparasitic deworming on wild animals in the Safari Park, Lahore, which is a captive environment, as well as to analyze the mortality of various animals. Methods: This was a prospective observational analytic study that was done in Safari Park, Lahore. Animals were classified as carnivores, herbivores, and birds and were treated with Albendazole or Fenbendazole depending on their species, size, and diet. These administration routes were oral, injectable, and oral feed-based. Worming was done every quarter under the guidance of the Punjab Wildlife Department, according to international guidelines, whereby effective and safe parasites in captive wildlife are treated. Results: Albendazole (5 liters) was given to herbivores and one liter to the birds, whereas Fenbendazole was given to carnivores. There was no mortality (0.00), which ascertained the efficacy of both treatments. Statistical test revealed no significant difference in the mortality of carnivores, herbivores, and birds (F (2,14) = 1.27, p=0.31), and no difference in the efficacy of Albendazole and Fenbendazole (t= 0.89, p=0.39). There is a negative correlational relationship between dosage and parasitic stress (r = 0.42, p<0.05), which is a sign of improved health outcomes. Overall, 19 carnivores, 423 herbivores, and 1,075 birds were successfully treated under veterinary supervision. Conclusions: Systematic antiparasitic management with Albendazole and Fenbendazole prevented mortality, ensuring effective, sustainable parasite control in Safari Park’s captive wildlife.